| 1. IDENTIFICATION & BASIC DESCRIPTION |
|
Cohort name
|
| |
AMIGO
|
|
Country
|
| |
|
|
Name
|
| |
Roel Vermeulen
|
|
Institution
|
| |
UU/IRAS
|
|
Email
|
| |
R.C.H.Vermeulen@uu.nl
|
|
Website
|
| |
- http://www.amigoproject.nl/
- http://www.lifeworkstudy.nl/
- http://www.thecosmosproject.org/
|
|
Name of committee
|
| |
METC UMCU
|
|
Or provide website
|
| |
- See websites mentioned above
|
|
Contact Principal Investigator (name)
|
| |
Prof. Dr. R. Vermeulen
|
|
Data access policy (briefly describe)
|
| |
Data is available upon request and a DTA will be created
|
|
Is this cohort part of a consortium? (name consortium)
|
| |
Lifework and COSMOS
|
|
Participation in pooled analyses
|
| |
- The cohort is potentially interested in participating in pooled analyses of (European) occupational cohort studies (note pooled analyses also includes remote decentralized analyses that would not require any transfer of primary data as well as meta-analyses).
|
|
Main aim of cohort, please briefly describe the main objectives of the cohort
|
| |
We set up the population-based Occupational and Environmental Health Cohort Study (AMIGO) to longitudinally study occupational and environmental determinants of diseases and wellbeing from a multidisciplinary and lifetime point of view. Determinants include chemical, biological, physical (e.g. electromagnetic fields), and psychosocial factors. Priority health outcomes include cancer, neurological, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases and non-specific symptoms. Owing to the recruitment strategy via general practitioners of an established network, we also collect longitudinal data on health outcomes registered in their electronic medical records including symptoms, diagnosis, and treatments. This created the unique opportunity to assess potential health-related participation bias by comparing general practitioner-registered prevalence rates in the cohort and the source population.
|
|
Study design (please select as many as appropriate)
|
| |
|
|
Source population (please select as many as appropriate)
|
| |
- General population: National
|
|
Comparators (please select as many as appropriate)
|
| |
- Internal study population
|
|
Inclusion criteria
|
| |
We aimed to sample the general adult population of the Netherlands and decided to select 31-65 years olds for various reasons, e.g. working age as occupational exposure is a main determinant, and the age of onset of our main health outpoints. Our recruitment strategy was to invite subjects through 99 general practices that are part of a nation-wide information and surveillance network for primary health care established at NIVEL, i.e. the NIVEL Primary Care Database
|
|
Enrollment
|
| |
Completed
|
|
Age range at entry (main cohort)
|
| |
| Minimum |
Maximum |
Mean |
| 31 |
65 |
50.7 |
|
|
Men at enrollment
|
| |
6561
|
|
Women at enrollment
|
| |
8268
|
|
Men at last follow-up
|
| |
3726
|
|
Women at last follow-up
|
| |
4179
|
|
Participation rate at enrollment (if known)
|
| |
16
|
| 2. OUTCOME FOLLOW-UP |
|
Type of data for outcome follow-up (please select as many as appropriate)
|
| |
- Active (contact with participants)
- Death certificate
- Disease incidence records
- Hospital / physician diagnoses
- Use of registers (specify)
|
|
Active (contact with participants) (specify)
|
| |
- By sending out questionnaires
|
|
Death certificate (specify)
|
| |
|
|
Disease incidence records (specify)
|
| |
- GP registries, questionnaires, Cancer registry
|
|
Hospital / Physician diagnoses (specify)
|
| |
|
|
Specify: Use of registers
|
| |
- CBS, Cancer registry, BRP, GP registry
|
|
First follow-up period (provide year)
|
| |
2013
|
|
Last follow-up period (provide year)
|
| |
2015
|
|
Number of follow-ups after baseline (provide number)
|
| |
3 (2014 in subcohort)
|
|
Participation at last follow-up (if known)
|
| |
53
|
| 3. OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES |
|
Source of exposure data collected (please select as many as appropriate)
|
| |
- Questionnaire, Personal (Self-reporting or interview)
- Questionnaire, Personal (Occupational/industry modules)
|
|
Occupational history/time frame
|
| |
Lifetime
|
|
Occupational coding performed
|
| |
No
|
|
Methods for exposure assessment (please select as many as appropriate)
|
| |
- Data modelling
- GIS (other spatial methods)
- Self-report
|
| 4. OUTCOMES EVALUATED |
|
Baseline - type of outcome data collected (select more than one if applicable)
|
| |
- Death certificates
- Medical records
- Questionnaire, individual (self-recording or interview)
- Registry-based
|
|
Registry-based
|
| |
- Cancer incidence
- Mortality register
|
|
Follow-up - type of outcome data collected (select more than one if applicable)
|
| |
- Death certificates
- Medical records
- Questionnaire, individual (self-recording or interview)
- Registry-based
|
|
Registry-based
|
| |
- Cancer incidence
- Mortality register
|
|
Outcome type (please select as many as appropriate)
|
| |
|
|
Other health related outcomes
|
| |
|
| 6. Other Information |
|
|
| |
- Alcohol
- Demographics
- Diet
- Education
- Environmental, air pollution
- Environmental other (specify)
- Medical history
- Physical exercise
- Residential history
- Socioeconomic status
- Smoking
|
|
Specify: Environmental other
|
| |
several exposures, such as EMF, noise
|
|
Possibility for linkage to data registries/data enrichment via data linkage
|
| |
- Cancer incidence
- Mortality register
|